Empresas pressionam Suprema Corte para anular poder tarifário de Trump
- Cerca de 40 petições foram apresentadas contestando política do governo americano
- Audiência que decidirá sobre legalidade das tarifas americanas ocorre nesta quarta (5)
Que continuem, precisamos da economia desse lixo em ruínas!
tomara q esse velho termine desmoralizado
E parece que a Suprema Corte não está sendo convencida pelos argumentos de Trump para taxar todos os países
Supreme Court appears skeptical of Trump’s tariffs argument
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices on Wednesday expressed some skepticism about President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs on imports under a law designed for use during a national emergency.
Markets are jumping on the apparent skepticism from Supreme Court justices over tariffs
As the oral arguments over tariffs continues, stocks have jumped to the highs of the day on the apparent skepticism from the Supreme Court justices.
At noon, the S&P 500 rose 0.7% after opening lower. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average popped about 200 points.
The Russell 2000 Index, which tracks smaller companies that could be hit much harder by tariffs than larger firms, rose nearly 1.5%.
At the same time, U.S. Treasury bonds fell and yields rose, signaling that the market may be worried about potential refunds that would be required if the administration loses the case.
Roberts says power to tax ‘has always been the core power of Congress’
Resumo
In an exchange with U.S. Solicitor General Sauer, Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to be skeptical about the argument that the government is using to push for Trump’s tariffs.
Roberts said “the imposition of taxes on Americans” has always “been the core power of Congress.”
Roberts also said the major questions doctrine “might be directly applicable.”
“The statue doesn’t use the word tariff,” Roberts said.
Kagan questions how Trump’s sweeping tariff authority wouldn’t be an unconstitutional delegation of congressional power
Resumo
Justice Elena Kagan, speaking to Solicitor General John Sauer, said that “if one does not think that with respect to tariffs … that a tariff is a taxing power, is a regulation of foreign commerce, that is really delegated by the Constitution to Congress, that argument does not sound so well.”
Kagan’s comment was one of many from both liberal and conservative justices questioning the assertion by the Trump administration.
Sauer argued that “everyone knows” that the U.S. is in a kind of emergency with regard to trade deficits, which is the administration’s premise for issuing sweeping tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act.
“It turns out we’re in emergencies about everything all the time,” Kagan quipped.
Justice Barrett asks why ‘every country needed to be tariffed’ by Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ duties
Resumo
“Is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Solicitior General John Sauer.
“I mean, Spain, France? I could see it with some countries, but explain to me why as many countries needed to be subject to the reciprocal tariff policy,” Barrett continued.
Sauer responded that “there’s this sort of lack of reciprocity, this asymmetric treatment of our trade, with respect to foreign countries that does run across the board,” repeating an argument the administration has used to invoke presidential authority to issue the duties under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act.
Agora eu entendi a cortina de fumaça
Aí bem q podia decidir q não eh atribuição donl presidente e fazer a webdiva da casa branca surtar horrores
Amiga mas pensando no cenário global, seria tudo eles continuarem e a China destronar ele de vez como maior parceiro global mundial
Eu queria q o cutrump surtasse de verdade e causasse uma guerra civil lah
Não deve estar tão longe né, ainda mais agora que NYC foi pra esquerda de verdade pela primeira vez na história
1 curtida